I said, “[The] only thing accelerating faster than COVID-19 is Anti-Asian attacks. Gonna do some data analysis. Need twitter handles for: 1) ppl who have brought awareness to attacks, 2) ppl noticeably silent, 3) ppl w openly racist posts. Plz respond or DM.”
As a researcher and a scholar, one way that I can help is through data. What ensued was a joint collaboration between myself and a number of researchers, including a group of researchers from Visual Risk IQ (visualriskiq.com). What we wanted to examine was some of these observations that I was having:
- Why were so many highly influential Asians staying so quiet on the matter?
- Whose voices carry weight?
- What is our sphere of influence?
- Whose voices carry weight?
And now that we have continued to see more racism, and I find myself fully ensconced in the #Asians4Blacks movement, I think these questions become even more salient.
We describe our analysis and methods here, but at a high level, our process entailed taking the 500 most influential individuals on Twitter, randomly selecting a group of these influencers who primarily identify as Black, Hispanic, or Asian, and then examining their tweets on issues relating to racial injustice, hate speech, and/or violence (for example, the Charleston church shootings in 2015).
We want to be clear that this analysis is incomplete—and is just our way of doing an exploratory first look at what it means to have voice during the midst of these terrible injustices and tragedies. We are not claiming that this is comprehensive, nor the authoritative source on these issues, but instead, provides a catalyst for important dialogue.
Among our most interesting findings was that Asians are “listened to” more when they speak about Asian (their own) issues, and that Blacks are “listened to” more when they DON’T speak about Black (their own) issues.